One Year of Autonomous Fundraising: Results, Lessons, and the Road Ahead

One year after introducing Virtual Engagement Officers (VEOs) to real donor portfolios, we've learned what works, what doesn't, and what fundraising leaders should do next. Renee Quinn and Emily Groccia walked through the highlights in our recent webinar, “The Data & Results Are In: One Year of Autonomous Fundraising.” 

Breaking the Capacity Ceiling

Most advancement teams personally manage 2-3% of their donors. The bottleneck isn't prospects—it's capacity. Virtual Engagement Officers (VEOs) add trusted digital labor to your team so more supporters receive authentic, one-to-one attention throughout the year. That promise is now playing out at scale.

What We Mean by Autonomous

Autonomous Fundraising means a Virtual Engagement Officer (VEO) owns the fundraising work from start to finish. The VEO researches prospects, initiates outreach, builds relationships, solicits gifts, and stewards donors. It operates independently inside clear guardrails and brand voice, and it is accountable for outcomes.

Accountability is measured in fundraising terms: revenue generated, upgrades, reactivations, qualified handoffs to gift officers, and pipeline growth. Enablement tools help staff work faster. Autonomy adds capacity and delivers results at scale.

Results from the First Year

In the first 12 months, Virtual Engagement Officers operated as true portfolio managers, taking full ownership from research and first touch to solicitation and stewardship. Here's what that work produced:

• $3.39M raised across participating partners

• 80,000+ donors managed and 33,000+ engagements

• 25,339 gifts processed

• 0.1% opt-out rate

• Largest single gift: $42,000

• Hundreds of thousands of activities managed autonomously

Year One established Autonomous Fundraising as a scalable model leaders can rely on. VEOs managed full portfolios end to end, delivered measurable revenue, and surfaced a repeatable portfolio design leaders can deploy now.

What We Learned About Donor Response

The open question a year ago was whether donors would engage. Here's what happened:

Donors respond to relevance, not technology. When outreach is personal, timely, and mission-aligned, donors engage—even those who began skeptical. We saw meaningful conversations, nuanced questions, and continued engagement across thousands of donors.

Transparency builds trust. When donors asked direct questions about AI assistance, VEOs answered clearly and honestly. Conversations continued—and deepened. In one example, a donor praised their VEO's accuracy and promptness after multiple exchanges, describing the experience as personable and helpful.

Opt-outs stay exceptionally low. A 0.1% opt-out rate signals that donors aren't rejecting the approach—they're responding to it.

Data Insights from Top-Performing Donors

Patterns from the first year give leaders a clearer way to design portfolios on purpose—whether the goal is near-term revenue, reactivation, or pipeline growth.

Near-term revenue: recency beats capacity. 

When the objective is dollars in the door, donors with recent giving or engagement consistently outperform long-lapsed, high-capacity names. In our top-dollar cohort, 88% had lapsed no more than one year, underscoring why recent activity should anchor portfolio construction.

Portfolio design: a mix that repeatedly wins. 

Top-producing portfolios shared the same shape: about 75% current donors with upgrade potential and 25% recently lapsed donors with strong history. That blend delivers revenue now and reliably surfaces donors ready to transition into a gift officer's portfolio.

Reacquisition: act before donors drift too far. 

Donors who lapsed one to two years ago respond a lot like your top-dollar group; the farther out the lapse, the harder the return. Prioritizing recent lapses turns reactivation into a steady pipeline rather than a sporadic win.

Demographics: dependable response in the 50–72 band. 

We saw the strongest engagement, revenue, and giving frequency among donors aged 50–72. Use that signal to guide messaging and channel choices while continuing to test other segments.

The Bigger Opportunity: Extend One-to-One Fundraising

Roughly 97.5% of donors receive no personal attention. With a Virtual Engagement Officer extending personal attention across that long tail, teams can surface qualified handoffs and broaden coverage without diluting the human work gift officers do best.

Where We're Heading

Year Two expands trusted digital labor where it's already creating value. We'll add coverage thoughtfully—more programs, more portfolios—while keeping the donor experience consistent and handoffs clean. The goal isn't to switch it on everywhere; it's to place it where signals are strong and standards stay high.

Phase 1 · Foundation 

Prove outcomes in a focused segment—leadership annual giving, recent-lapse reactivation—and establish the playbook that works.

Phase 2 · Strategic Expansion

Extend the same approach to adjacent segments where engagement signals are strong: event donors, grateful patients, monthly sustainers, planned giving prospects.

Phase 3 · Specialized Deployment 

Stand up program-specific VEOs by cause area, service line, chapter, or school for broader coverage and deeper mission alignment.

This is how we move from a strong first year to durable reach—placing autonomy where it works and giving fundraisers more time for the conversations that truly require them.

---

Next Steps

Prefer to watch? Catch the full conversation here: Watch the webinar recording.

Want to explore this for your organization? Book time with our team: Schedule a demo.